Gers Are Still Gers

[oahpekahsom]

Originally Posted by vesfreq

Girls, or for that matter, women are perpetually imperceptible to the mind of a common man.

.

Agreed with ya generally...true good gf or wives will even support ya when ya financially down...
but back to the topic...women are wired differently, go borrow the book from library "Man from Mars women from Venus" then ya know why sometimes women are so unpredictable!!

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by zodiac

have you guys been hit with the deadly question when she almost couldn't fit into one of her jeans/dress

Am I fat??

wah! the killer question... that is the ultimate test for showmanship... having to lie straight face... "NO, not fat.. where got?" or "you sure that's your jeans or was it someone else?" or "erh, i think its the lousy cotton quality lah, shrunk after the wash lah"

then what happens next? pocket burn.. go shopping for new clothes that actually fit

[beck7777]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

wah! the killer question... that is the ultimate test for showmanship... having to lie straight face... "NO, not fat.. where got?" or "you sure that's your jeans or was it someone else?" or "erh, i think its the lousy cotton quality lah, shrunk after the wash lah"

then what happens next? pocket burn.. go shopping for new clothes that actually fit

shopping is another nightmare! go with them, u get bored.. dun go n the swipe ur card as if its FOC..

giving comments is the worst.. they always ask u which piece is nicer when they oredi made up their mind.. more often than not they end up buying both pieces...

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

LOL, be reminded.. we men are realistic... the gals tend to be idealistic and demand what is hollistic. which literally is eratic.

i never claimed that i'm fantastic, but in view of your poor comprehension to misinterpret that i've been portraying the posts on a personal scale... you really should buck up..

and do us all a favor, dont be so pathetic.

Whether men are realistic or women are idealistic is only from your own perception.

Whatever things that these girls want, is up to them. U can choose to give or choose to move on.
If u want to choose to give, then u must use your fav phrase that is 甘愿就好。

Whether u are portraying the posts on a personal or general scale, we leave it to the readers to judge.

I am portraying you from my personal scale because of the fact of you saying SG girls from your own personal scale.

If SG girls are so chum, then u better spend time with foreign girls and don't rattle non-stop here as SG girls REALLY don't need men like you. Just like men like you think too much of yourselves that SG girls can't live without you all. But in actual fact, SG girls can.

*Btw, please read your idealistic signature.

SC

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by beck7777

shopping is another nightmare! go with them, u get bored.. dun go n the swipe ur card as if its FOC..

giving comments is the worst.. they always ask u which piece is nicer when they oredi made up their mind.. more often than not they end up buying both pieces...

Can u live without this kind of girl? If u cannot live with it, them u just have to bear with it

SC

[Rof|maoxz]

Originally Posted by beck7777

shopping is another nightmare! go with them, u get bored.. dun go n the swipe ur card as if its FOC..

giving comments is the worst.. they always ask u which piece is nicer when they oredi made up their mind.. more often than not they end up buying both pieces...

Nope, it's another way round for my missus. When she's indecisive, she will call off the buy and went again some other days. She prefer to shop herself as she knows that whatever she choose, I will comment "quite nice" or "buy buy". Luckily she's not brand conscious, except yearning for a branded Gucci bag. Which is not too overboard.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

wah! so now GE coming along, you campainging for Woman's Action Party or wat? did i even mention words of ego, stating that the male species being almighty & all??

read carefully, if its not clear enough for your poor comprehension skills - in a nutshell: i'm suggesting that there should be some equality and/or balance

fyi: blasting the gals is 1 thing, least to say, i've never condemned...

This is what you quoted earlier

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

since the mid-late 80s to date, girl power & woman independence start taking place. woman wanting to wear the pants in & outside of the house etc. even if their not the breadwinners, they too have their fair share of supplementing expenses - somehow or other, the ladies too have a job, and in the given environment, the competitiveness morph n change them into monsters.at the turn of the new millenium.. what happens? woman liberation? woman independence? its becoming rampant.. and what do we hear these days? women can make do without the men... so, does this mean that the male species is now redundant??

1 thing's for sure, they cant live without: dial-a chauffeur. who's readily available to pick her up at her demand. (so they can slouch & recline in the seat to catch a little shut eye, while resting those blistered feet - after a day of gruelling shopping in killer heels)

These analogies by you are enough to say you are a MCP

1) Why can't women be breadwinners?
2) Why can't there be woman liberation and independence?

3) Who says they can't live without a dial-in chauffeur or is it because you cannot be the one to drive the wheels instead?

*Btw, I CONDEMNED PROSTITUTES WHO CON MEN FOR MONEY, instead of WORKING FOR IT. IT's fine if they sell their service but not to the extent of CON/LIE to get their dough.

SC

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

Whether men are realistic or women are idealistic is only from your own perception.

Whatever things that these girls want, is up to them. U can choose to give or choose to move on.
If u want to choose to give, then u must use your fav phrase that is 甘愿就好。

Whether u are portraying the posts on a personal or general scale, we leave it to the readers to judge.

I am portraying you from my personal scale because of the fact of you saying SG girls from your own personal scale.

If SG girls are so chum, then u better spend time with foreign girls and don't rattle non-stop here as SG girls REALLY don't need men like you. Just like men like you think too much of yourselves that SG girls can't live without you all. But in actual fact, SG girls can.

*Btw, please read your idealistic signature.

SC

well, as much as i've read here, i'm not the only 1 with the same problems with sg gals. i'm sure there've been many who've concurred with some of my postings, and opinions on sg gals

no doubt, in most cases, its just a constant struggle on the term 甘愿就好. nonetheless, has it been all that worthwhile??? if you claim that gals of other nationalities take the men for a ride of their life... think again, are the reciprocations of the sg gals any better - by taking their men for granted??

idealisitic signature? if its not all about 甘愿就好, i really dont know how else you've misinterpreted it once again (as always)

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

These analogies by you are enough to say you are a MCP

1) Why can't women be breadwinners?
2) Why can't there be woman liberation and independence?
3) Who says they can't live without a dial-in chauffeur or is it because you cannot be the one to drive the wheels instead?

to answer your questions to prove otherwise:
1) by all means they can be the breadwinner, and the men stay home to be homemakers. whoever brings home the moola, as long as it sustains the runnings of the household - but by no means should they ever breathe a word about he man not being able to contribute.

2) liberation & independence, sure why not..? which also means there shouldnt be double standards, comlpaining & comparing what others' men can provide for the friend/colleague - precisely because we're all individuals with different qualities & attirbutes. (they settled for a man who's less extravagant - too bad so sad... just as you said it - live with it)

3) dial-a-chauffeur..? well, if its not the case... and a growing trend among ladies these days, it wouldnt even be brought up in the thread. (about me not being able to drive??? LOL, sorry.. many have proven that they cant go anywhere without car - often forgetting that there're cabs readily available. more likely perhaps their hands stuffed with shopping bags/handbag, while the other hand is holding the phone; busy yapping away - unable to raise hands to flag down cab.)

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

well, as much as i've read here, i'm not the only 1 with the same problems with sg gals. i'm sure there've been many who've concurred with some of my postings, and opinions on sg gals

no doubt, in most cases, its just a constant struggle on the term 甘愿就好. nonetheless, has it been all that worthwhile??? if you claim that gals of other nationalities take the men for a ride of their life... think again, are the reciprocations of the sg gals any better - by taking their men for granted??

idealisitic signature? if its not all about 甘愿就好, i really dont know how else you've misinterpreted it once again (as always)

Gers are still Gers. They have certain characteristics due to the fact they are girls.

But not to the extend of being deemed as 'Mercenaries', 'Unreasonables' as quoted in your examples.

No problem. Since all blast liao very shiok right, then kenna blast feel shiok or not?

Those who concurred with u, how many of them are married to SG girls? Come here rant and rant then lan lan at home suck thumb ah. So now is who cannot live with who? If one is not happy with them, leave them lor.

All say until so garang but in the end still are the ones still cannot live with SG girls. Not SG girls cannot live without you all.

SC

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

to answer your questions to prove otherwise:
1) by all means they can be the breadwinner, and the men stay home to be homemakers. whoever brings home the moola, as long as it sustains the runnings of the household - but by no means should they ever breathe a word about he man not being able to contribute.

2) liberation & independence, sure why not..? which also means there shouldnt be double standards, comlpaining & comparing what others' men can provide for the friend/colleague - precisely because we're all individuals with different qualities & attirbutes. (they settled for a man who's less extravagant - too bad so sad... just as you said it - live with it)

3) dial-a-chauffeur..? well, if its not the case... and a growing trend among ladies these days, it wouldnt even be brought up in the thread. (about me not being able to drive??? LOL, sorry.. many have proven that they cant go anywhere without car - often forgetting that there're cabs readily available. more likely perhaps their hands stuffed with shopping bags/handbag, while the other hand is holding the phone; busy yapping away - unable to raise hands to flag down cab.)

I have already put it very simply.

1) If the man is unable to contribute and wants to be a gigolo and eat soft rice, then his face must be damn thick. U think this kind of thick face man can be bothered by what people say when he already agreed to be gigolo?

However if both husband and wife are working whether the husband is a homemaker or a breadwinner, he contributes in a way. People will understand the wife's success in her career is because of the man behind her.

It's only people like you who loves to magnify the flaws and cover the good, that is why it seems this way. Why don't you magnify the good parts instead?

2)That is the capability of Women these days. U should be happy over it and not feel threatened over their presence. People who felt threatened is because of their incapability and also because of their low self-esteem.

3) They don't need u to drive them around. They have their ways and can do what they want. They want to shop with bags this and that, who are you to stop them?

U go Geylang call prostitutes, they also cannot stop you. Now u want to criticize them for going shopping with bags while yakking on the phone?

SC

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

I have already put it very simply.

1) If the man is unable to contribute and wants to be a gigolo and eat soft rice, then his face must be damn thick. U think this kind of thick face man can be bothered by what people say when he already agreed to be gigolo?

However if both husband and wife are working whether the husband is a homemaker or a breadwinner, he contributes in a way. People will understand the wife's success in her career is because of the man behind her.

It's only people like you who loves to magnify the flaws and cover the good, that is why it seems this way. Why don't you magnify the good parts instead?

2)That is the capability of Women these days. U should be happy over it and not feel threatened over their presence. People who felt threatened is because of their incapability and also because of their low self-esteem.

3) They don't need u to drive them around. They have their ways and can do what they want. They want to shop with bags this and that, who are you to stop them?

U go Geylang call prostitutes, they also cannot stop you. Now u want to criticize them for going shopping with bags while yakking on the phone?

SC

eh... SC ah SC.. better get it straight hor..

1) home making hubby doesnt mean he's a gigolo that is incapable of earning his own keep or contributing to the household. some entrepreneurs operate from home office, and make pretty decent earnings. and nothing wrong about the female spouses being career women and all... bt more so the point of discussion was based on taking their men for granted..

2) i never saw them as a threat. the more career women the better... and the better the economy too. its nevertheless their character & air of arrogance these days that makes us buay tahan...

3) well, consider it fortunate that you've yet to encounter 1 that is car-bound...

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

eh... SC ah SC.. better get it straight hor..

1) home making hubby doesnt mean he's a gigolo that is incapable of earning his own keep or contributing to the household. some entrepreneurs operate from home office, and make pretty decent earnings. and nothing wrong about the female spouses being career women and all... bt more so the point of discussion was based on taking their men for granted..

2) i never saw them as a threat. the more career women the better... and the better the economy too. its nevertheless their character & air of arrogance these days that makes us buay tahan...

3) well, consider it fortunate that you've yet to encounter 1 that is car-bound...

1) Men also take women for granted, then why u never say? Thats why I always said you like to magnify the flaws and put the good at 1 side.

2) These women are capable, that is why they can be arrogant. They can be arrogant because they don't need men like you or us. It takes 2 hands to clap. If they do not want to clap hands with you, why you still insist on it. Why can't u just leave these so-called arrogant women alone, and instead chose to whine at them. By whining over this situation only magnifies your incapability.

3) When I encounter 1 that is car-bound, I either live with it, or I leave her. As simple as that. I don't need to live with her and chose to grumble all her flaws(like what u are doing now) on an online community.


I still reiterate my point. if u think these group of gals are unsuitable for you, don't go for them, because u may think they are unsuitable for you but in actual fact, you are actually not suitable for them either.

SC

[beck7777]

Originally Posted by Rof|maoxz

Nope, it's another way round for my missus. When she's indecisive, she will call off the buy and went again some other days. She prefer to shop herself as she knows that whatever she choose, I will comment "quite nice" or "buy buy". Luckily she's not brand conscious, except yearning for a branded Gucci bag. Which is not too overboard.

lucky u.. i rem my ex is so brand conscious.. no brand no buy.. and her facial! i dunno spend how much on her SK II!!!!!

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

1) Men also take women for granted, then why u never say? Thats why I always said you like to magnify the flaws and put the good at 1 side.

2) These women are capable, that is why they can be arrogant. They can be arrogant because they don't need men like you or us. It takes 2 hands to clap. If they do not want to clap hands with you, why you still insist on it. Why can't u just leave these so-called arrogant women alone, and instead chose to whine at them. By whining over this situation only magnifies your incapability.

3) When I encounter 1 that is car-bound, I either live with it, or I leave her. As simple as that. I don't need to live with her and chose to grumble all her flaws(like what u are doing now) on an online community.


I still reiterate my point. if u think these group of gals are unsuitable for you, don't go for them, because u may think they are unsuitable for you but in actual fact, you are actually not suitable for them either.

SC

LOL, well... i express just as much as many others with the similiar issues, yet you continuously make your rebutals personal... as for the above 3 points you echoed repeatedly like a broken recorder... not to worry.. its been noted. we dont have comprehension levels the likes of yours.

either live it or leave it.. haha! easier said than done. wait till the pen is put to the paper, and having more implications when you choose to leave it. and when you lppl, and living it, i truly wonder if you'd reminisce n recall the postings shared here

(thats only if you'd ever find 1 who'd be willing so settle with you, accept your over bearing nonsense on your policies & anal pessimist outlook)