Woes of a Cat 40 tirak.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by The_Unrepentant

then wat abt normal woman?: u got con b4 right ? see.... u never swear upon tat. must be got con b4.

1 thing straight first.

He accused me of conning a Prostitute $500 from Lor8 Hse43.
Let's not drift too far first. One issue at a time.

SC

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

I swear upon this that you said above. BUt hor, correction, I don't wish to say I am bloody righteous, or virtuous(this one is for char bor)

I only swear upon that I never con any girl in Geylang of $500/-.

Do you dare to swear what you accused me of is correct then?

Lai la, I up all stakes.

If I ever did con any WL/FL, not only my next life become whore, even my children also become whores.
However if you did accuse me of something I did not do, how about all your children become whores?
U dare to swear upon this boh? Or do you want to wait for the fat lady to sing....


SC

LOL... my challenge to you was not just for the said amount, neither for the 3 number tags i've quoted, but on the fact; that in your yrs of glorious bonking count under your belt, that you've never received any material/monetary gains from a FL/WL/woman....

and if it is so, that indeed, you've received... then by all means, may the consequences of your oath come true. by the way, dont come discaliming that the girl gave you at her own free will. just as you concluded yourself, once a whore, always a whore... likewise, once you received from the girl(s) = you're a con artiste yourself. otherwise known as the male version of the term "KARI"

on the contrary, you've no evidence for allergations against me, for the similiar act. LOL... so there's nothing for me to swear about. this being the case, we'll just have to wait for the fat lady to sing then...

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by The_Unrepentant

then wat abt normal woman? u got con b4 right ? see.... u never swear upon tat. must be got con b4.

after all these while of correspondence between me & SC, its quite evident that he practices selective reading, selective memory...etc. Now, he also practice selective "oath taking".. LOL

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

1 thing straight first.

He accused me of conning a Prostitute $500 from Lor8 Hse43.
Let's not drift too far first. One issue at a time.

SC

So funny... that PM that you attached, was just 1 of the several PMs (on the subject matter) that i've had with Jun, and i've also sounded caution that this piece of tabloid was not to be taken seriously, as such is just a vicious cycle, that events take place as we speak, just that its not being brought to light.. and for the fact that i wasnt present to witness the transaction - which then makes it one's words against his (and this parchment seems to be missing from your quote)

once again, you selectively publish what you deem to be malicious towards you on a personal scale, for what reasons? make yourself the victim of accusations? which to date, you've yet to come clean with your cause for being involved in tirakship, despite your violent objections against it. 1 thing we know for certain, you can really twist others words, paint a pathetic picture, influence others to think/believe along the same wavelength as you.

for such a trivial little matter on the issue that you ripped off the said amount from a WL, and for you to admit to the committed act (plead guilty), and then appeal for evidences some time later (plead innocence), seems no difference to what some convicted of criminal charges, appealing for lighter sentence or pardon - as we read in the papers these days. (best is the current classic - your selective "oath taking")

if indeed tirakship somehow or other provides patrons with value added services, then you should be shutting you gap on the issue, and allow others to enjoy the "perks" too. even more so, you're in no position to judge or comment about.

in the given case per say, are you truly rendering help/valuable advise to all aspiring tiraks to abstain, or are you demonstrating your arrogance that you're immune to the KC poison - as i'd like to refer to the term as "叔叔有练过“.

or rather... adopting the nemesis role to challenge my opinions on a regular basis, to prove your seniority/ AUTHORITY in here, and that only you are entitled to have views, while others should just listen to your preaching?? (while you contradict yourself, by happily soaking in your so-called cestpool of tirakship)

having said so, its quite clear that you've been nothing but an empty vessel making a hell lot of noise, crying foul that you've fallen victim of the "con-artistes", while at the point in time - you freely gave (without obligations/strings attached).

to the extent, demonstrating that you're sulking over sour grapes, perhaps fuelled by envy/jealousy that others have a smoother journey, as compared to your dramatic/colorful past failed endeavors.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

LOL... my challenge to you was not just for the said amount, neither for the 3 number tags i've quoted, but on the fact; that in your yrs of glorious bonking count under your belt, that you've never received any material/monetary gains from a FL/WL/woman.......

You should really wash your mouth with lactyde
Now the issue here is you accused me of conning a girl $500 from Hse43 Lor8. I say I didn't. U said yes.

I swear I didn't. You start to come and say I received something from FL/WL/woman.

My mother is a woman. My birthdays in the past she gave me ang pow. She gave me birthday presents.
My ex-girlfriends are all women, all gave me birthday presents.

Now I ask you 1 simple question.

Do you dare to say that I con 1 WL of $500 from Hse43 Lor8?

I guess you don't dare to swear upon what you said if you are so damn sure of what you said.
As for me, I have never con any girl from Hse43 $500 neither any WL of $500 before. I dare to say so. I dare to swear upon it.

U? U only know how to bring us around merry go round.

SC

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

So funny... that PM that you attached, was just 1 of the several PMs (on the subject matter) that i've had with Jun, and i've also sounded caution that this piece of tabloid was not to be taken seriously, as such is just a vicious cycle, that events take place as we speak, just that its not being brought to light.. and for the fact that i wasnt present to witness the transaction - which then makes it one's words against his (and this parchment seems to be missing from your quote)

once again, you selectively publish what you deem to be malicious towards you on a personal scale, for what reasons? make yourself the victim of accusations? which to date, you've yet to come clean with your cause for being involved in tirakship, despite your violent objections against it. 1 thing we know for certain, you can really twist others words, paint a pathetic picture, influence others to think/believe along the same wavelength as you.

for such a trivial little matter on the issue that you ripped off the said amount from a WL, and for you to admit to the committed act (plead guilty), and then appeal for evidences some time later (plead innocence), seems no difference to what some convicted of criminal charges, appealing for lighter sentence or pardon - as we read in the papers these days. (best is the current classic - your selective "oath taking")

if indeed tirakship somehow or other provides patrons with value added services, then you should be shutting you gap on the issue, and allow others to enjoy the "perks" too. even more so, you're in no position to judge or comment about.

in the given case per say, are you truly rendering help/valuable advise to all aspiring tiraks to abstain, or are you demonstrating your arrogance that you're immune to the KC poison - as i'd like to refer to the term as "叔叔有练过“.

or rather... adopting the nemesis role to challenge my opinions on a regular basis, to prove your seniority/ AUTHORITY in here, and that only you are entitled to have views, while others should just listen to your preaching?? (while you contradict yourself, by happily soaking in your so-called cestpool of tirakship)

having said so, its quite clear that you've been nothing but an empty vessel making a hell lot of noise, crying foul that you've fallen victim of the "con-artistes", while at the point in time - you freely gave (without obligations/strings attached).

to the extent, demonstrating that you're sulking over sour grapes, perhaps fuelled by envy/jealousy that others have a smoother journey, as compared to your dramatic/colorful past failed endeavors.

Wah, not bad siah. I write 3 sentences, u come out with so many paragraphs.

Make it short and simple.
DO u dare to swear upon that what you said about me conning $500 from a WL in Hse43 Lor 8 is true???

SO short and simple only, u have to write thesis.

SC

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

after all these while of correspondence between me & SC, its quite evident that he practices selective reading, selective memory...etc. Now, he also practice selective "oath taking".. LOL

The issue here is about WL, u start to bring in women.

Why can't u just go straight to the point?Do you dare to say that I con 1 WL of $500 from Hse43 Lor8?

I have to repeat 3 times, because you keep avoiding this subject and coming with something else.

SC

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by Jun|ch|

This guy whoever it was had achieved his aims,by starting yet another meaningless war over the same old stupid issue again...

For ur info SC,its was Jun|ch| nick indeed,but not me...

If i so gum with u,share with u,i wonder why are we debating earlier in the afternoon??

One moment you are Dr Jekll, the other moment you are Mr Hyde. Thats why I said u need a shrink

SC

[WorldSexGuide]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

You should really wash your mouth with lactyde
Now the issue here is you accused me of conning a girl $500 from Hse43 Lor8. I say I didn't. U said yes.

I swear I didn't. You start to come and say I received something from FL/WL/woman.


Now I ask you 1 simple question.

Do you dare to say that I con 1 WL of $500 from Hse43 Lor8?

I guess you don't dare to swear upon what you said if you are so damn sure of what you said.
As for me, I have never con any girl from Hse43 $500 neither any WL of $500 before. I dare to say so. I dare to swear upon it.

U? U only know how to bring us around merry go round.

SC

This suteerak is a joker.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by WorldSexGuide

This suteerak is a joker.

Everytime i start asking him, this suteerak will start to MIA go and hide and now really 'hiding' in world cup forum.

Yesterday same thing, while he was posting, i replied, he went MIA also.

After a while, u can catch his pattern

SC

[WorldSexGuide]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

Everytime i start asking him, this suteerak will start to MIA go and hide and now really 'hiding' in world cup forum.

Yesterday same thing, while he was posting, i replied, he went MIA also.

After a while, u can catch his pattern

SC

I think a lot of people know his pattern long time ago. that is why cant be bothered with him.

[newbadass]

Originally Posted by bkkjun

To be able to last that long in a forum advising people here in tirakships,and not meeting people on gatherings,one cant help but imagine what a cyberhero u are...

This has nothing to do with anything.

I do go to the TCSSS gatherings, but not because I am a hero. It's because I chiong KTV... and KTV is not something you chiong alone. It's a very social activity. Generally, people tend to meet up with others from SBF to chiong KTV together. So since I have already met so many SBF guys while chionging KTV, what's a few more in TCSSS?

If I only go for Cat40, TN, HC etc, then maybe I won't meet up with others from SBF because I am not used to it. Not wanting to meet with other forumers in outside is quite a legitimate stance, nothing to harp over. In fact I don't understand those FLs that grace the TCSSS sessions sometimes. Doing FL very glam meh? Need to show your face to everyone meh?

[naemlo]

Originally Posted by newbadass

I do go to the TCSSS gatherings, but not because I am a hero. It's because I chiong KTV... and KTV is not something you chiong alone. It's a very social activity.

Didn't c u jioing me go KTV

[DNAT]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

LOL... my challenge to you was not just for the said amount, neither for the 3 number tags i've quoted, but on the fact; that in your yrs of glorious bonking count under your belt, that you've never received any material/monetary gains from a FL/WL/woman....

Con and Received same meh?
You con, you might receive (might not) something
But when one receives something, not necessary to be the result of Con-ing

SC received something from WL you say SC con WL.

Oi, can you explain why you labelled your gal fren's customer as bastard?

dun merry-go-round liao

[singrakthai]

Originally Posted by newbadass

In fact I don't understand those FLs that grace the TCSSS sessions sometimes. Doing FL very glam meh? Need to show your face to everyone meh?

I think its call "net working".... can get more referral business in future mah.
Anyway, u don't listen to Jun... I jio him out initially to ask him to prove to me which part I said wrong about him, he also don't dare to come out (dun even dare pick up phone calls somemore!), now he call SC a cyberhero for not wanting to meet any samsters? Once a joker, always a joker.... hehe