Searching for a cocktail pick to poke my lychee. :p (In need of a fling/FB.)

[tookara]

go geylang must be kio kway meh? cannot just be having a tea session with friends?

[mi$$y]

Originally Posted by tookara

go geylang must be kio kway meh? cannot just be having a tea session with friends?

lol i go pump petrol

[lychee-martini]

Originally Posted by blackknight24

I not handsome and charming , but i very realistic.i never expect to impress lychee or want her as FB.
for me, my skin very thin, cannot take rejection easy. so better not try. probably i got the same thinking as lychee, she want handsome guy but paiseh to apporach them as in fear they might reject. so come here and find bros here lor.

I don't need to have handsome guys. Neither am I hesistant to approach them for fear of rejection. Having good looks is not everything, but possessing good character and attitude is. I have alot of good-looking male friends, but their good looks DO NOT compel me to sleep with any of them.

Cheers everyone, have a nice Sunday!

[soulzsinner]

I guess a lot of people are finding this deal too good to be true. A lady looking for a FB? Most of the time, it’s the other way around. So, when a lady posted a thread like this, it’s only natural to feel that she is either fugly or she’s simply a whore/FL hoping to up her market value.

Like many members here, with great scepticism, I’ve decided to try my luck and sent Lynn a PM. With some luck, we really did meet up. What happened during the meet-up, I shall not elaborate too much. All I can say is that this is for real.

To dismiss some myths around her, she is certainly not a whore. If she is indeed a whore, I believe she would have offered me a price. Why spend a couple of hours with me only to go home empty handed? (Maybe I’m too fugly to be offered one, haha) Also, she is not in any sense of the word, ugly. Certainly, she may not be your celebrity-like beauty but conservatively speaking, she is definitely above-average, or even good-looking depending on your benchmark. She offered an accurate description of her looks in her first post (height, hair, etc).

Some of us may also wonder why she chose to post a thread here. If she’s really decent-looking, she will not have to do this. Honestly, I do not know her well enough to rationalise her decision for the starting a thread like this. But what I do know is that she’s a sincere person with an interesting life. Perhaps, like she said, she’s finding it hard to be “transparent in the real world” when is comes to finding a FB. Also, she didn’t try to get a free meal out of me because we split the bill, a result of her insistence. She’s crazy about her shoes and she did stress that if I’m thinking of buying her one, do it only if I feel that she rightly deserves it. At least for now, I am sure that she is not out to take advantage of guys financially.

Not trying to act hero here, just offering my opinion.

[codicerous]

Originally Posted by blackknight24

where got men , good looking yet good attitude, you dreaming?
this lychee is very contradicting, u love pretty shoes and claimed to be flamboyant, but not your fb or men? isnt that contradiciting?

wah bro u dun need to sleep ah ? day in day out monitoring this thread, creating trouble... flaming other bros?

i already gave you 4 green tea liao.. wat else you want? are you one of the bros she rejected or wat? move along lah..... if like what you said, you din bother contacting Lynn, then for what you come in here just to KPKB ? finger itchy is it? or backside itchy need a couple of pokes?

you sound like an angry kid leh.... chill ok ... drink some green tea and move on...

[mbam]

Originally Posted by codicerous

you sound like an angry kid leh.... chill ok ... drink some green tea and move on...

Brother codicerous, he indeed is a angry kid if you look at his Petain FR and you would understand, your green tea is good but just got its limitation in certain treatment..

But I think your green tea sure works well on me as weather v hot recently

[tookara]

whats with his petain fr

[gdgal88]

hey sis!

you sound brainy, i likey

and im not a guy, hence not interested in being your fb or anything liddat..

was just wondering why i never noticed this amazing thread started by an amazing lady

and no i dun have guys to recommend. hehe.

anyway, just wanna say, I LIKE YOU!!!!
even though i dun really like the drink itself~

[ahbuneh]

sigh..

awaitin on hotstandby 2 b call up by miSSy..

but prob doesnt fullfill her criteria..

so sad..

[walle]

Originally Posted by lychee-martini

Alright, pardon my humourous thread title. I am simply in need of a gentleman who can be my activity partner.

I just need someone who I can share my life with. Not being romantic or such. I mean to say someone who is not just an FB; but also a friend I can wine and dine with, have intelligent conversations with, and I might(?) get zapped for saying this- go shopping with. It's just that I have so much free time!!! I could do with some company.

A self-introduction
I am 23, chinese, above-average to good-looking depending on subjective male opinion, above average height- in between 1.65m-1.7m, 34-24-34 in vital statistics, small C/D cup, quite toned but still curvy, rather fair, rather slim. I have long curly/wavy black hair, no tattoos, no weird piercings. I don't smoke, drink quite abit, am well-groomed, very horny/wild, ETC.

Basically, I like to believe I am quite alright looks-wise but I know I'm no supermodel. Appearance is truly subjective and a matter of preference. One man's meat is another man's poison, as often quoted around here.

Criteria

1. -Chinese male
2. -Above 1.7m (I love to wear heels and may end up taller.)
3. -Age 26 and above
4. -Average-looking and above
5. -Toned/Fit
6. -Skilled lover
7. -Gentlemanly/Caring
8. -Will be there for me when I need him. (Not unreasonable-beck-and-call type but more of reachable-during-emergencies type.)
9. -Will gladly buy me a pair of nice shoes every month. (If you feel I don't deserve it at any point in time, I will pay out of my own pocket.)
10. -Must fulfill all above criteria.

I ask for alot and take alot because I also have much to give. My logic is that it makes no sense to go lower than what I already have. My FB's are mostly rich playboys... but they're all busy and some are real dickheads. I just want an experienced player who can charm me.

I know someone will definitely say something like: "You think what?! You golden cunt/CB/abalone ah?" OR "School holidays! Must be another joker!" OR "If really so pretty why cannot find outside?"
The reason why I post here is that any agenda/motive can be openly declared and laid bare, unlike in the real world where there's so much hesitation and doubt because you're not sure what the other party wants/is thinking; which is why I am making it clear right here, rather than going to some club and ending up with with a ONS.

Interested parties please PM me or send an email to [email protected] with as much detail about yourself as possible and kindly attach a recent picture of yourself. NPNT! (No picture, no talk!) Thank you.

p/s If you do not fulfill half the criteria, please don't bother trying your luck. Sorry, just being realistic.

Feel like sending my pics to you..cos dun said shoes every mth, everyday also can but but I am not fit or toned...most importantly I Married. Paiseh

[walle]

actually, by goin thru ur posts, i can say u r a intelligent lady....with powerful and confident
words dat kills...well too bad I fail in one of ur cats.....

[tuxedosam]

shaken, not stirred?

chanced upon this thread outta some cosmic coincidence...definitely entertaining...

ahh...a good bro pointed out above that our sis TS isn't a whore (please note that i'm not insinuating in any way that she is a conventional FL or whatever, not that there is anything wrong with being a sex worker) but what exactly is a whore? when is a prostitute an unmistakable harlot? seriously, when is a dog a dog? what makes a dog so identifiably a dog? and then again, when did the wolf become a dog?

simple? not quite. ermmm...at least it's really not really that clear-cut, or is it? okay, i might just be playing the devil's advocate but i'd wager that if a prostitute is defined as a person who provides sexual favours in exchange for some kind of payment, then one has also gotta take a step back and reappraise certain things. would you call a kept woman a whore? maybe? would you call someone who agreed to a loveless marriage with a successful billionaire out of pure greed and a desire to achieve material gratification one? maybe not? sure, these might appear to be progressively extended examples but with all due seriousness, if we were to refer back to the paradigm about the transactional nature of whore-dom being its determining benchmark, then isn't it fair to say that what we narrowly call prostitution is simply only a certain set of human behaviour along a long continuum of very similar and related possibilities? sure, there are fine distinctions that can be made this way or another, but there are also fundamental similarities that cannot be ignored or denied either.

in this case, a mechanism of material exchange was indeed specified by the TS in her original criteria of suitability (in addition to the applicant having to meet a certain minimal level of investment-willingness on the indices of time and effort). although she did clarify that she would not insist that the successful applicant(s) be compelled to buy her a pair of designer shoes a month, the actual caveat really hinged upon whether the 'contract' still stands in the event that the applicant concerned finds her undeserving. that last bit is certainly interesting. you can have plenty of close female friends and be pretty open and generous with each other (generosity ought to be gender-blind and freely reciprocated, no?) but you probably wouldn't buy them each a pair of ferragamos every month (or think of your friends in terms of 'deservingness'), now would you? i have several close female chums (and we're otherwise definitely generous with each other when it comes to picking up the tab on booze, chow and other shit) and i know i wouldn't. and neither would they ask me to. not unless there's more to it than meets the eye, i'd think at least. so what would the TS have to do to prove herself worthy and deserving of her prize? doll herself up to meet the exploitative fantasy-tinged tendencies of the male gaze? be a total sexual triathlete? be able to stroke the ego of the successful applicant the total right way? be at the occasional beck and call of the applicant, whether in terms of dates or bonks? i'm curious. call it whatever one wants, but it all sounds quite familiar enough.

please do not misunderstand me. i am not trying to allege that you are looking for an FB kangtow that allows you to prostitute yourself. in fact, it almost sounds as if you're looking for a BF or pseudo-BF (or at least a sugar daddy) instead...which goes back to my point about this distinction between so-called 'prostitution' and other forms of social relationships being an unusually artificial and contrived one (just think about all those BF-GF couplings which are based primarily, if not solely, on some form of benefit-for-favour arrangement...my gawd, is a relationship just based on whether some otherwise tasteless twit is gonna get you a cheapo monogram-infested LV bag!?). since you mentioned the bit about being 'caring' and 'gentlemanly', i suppose going dutch is out of the question, eh? pretty good way of exploiting the sexist structures and ideologies of this society out there (whether you're 'with' them or not), if i dare say...heheh... at the very least, you'd definitely be enjoying a non-stop flow of free lychee martinis, just for starters. seriously, good for you, sis TS. i don't think you'll have any difficulty assembling a platoon of eligible applicants in any case. i dun like stereotypes at all, including those based around gender or sexual orientation, for example...but i think you know well enough as well as i do that men can be such sad suckers (and i'm not implying that anyone that meets up with the TS is befitting of that term, please do not misunderstand).

i do wonder if you'll be able to give back an approximate equivalent of the very criteria you established to any successful applicant. what's your idea of an 'intelligent conversation', for example? i've heard this one from many women and a sizable percentage seem to think it means everything about themselves and their actually rather parochial and one-dimensional lives...so maybe it pays to be a bit circumspect and skeptical? would you care to chat about the emancipation of sexual minorities? or talk at length about structured investment vehicles? or how about a lyrical wank about vintage champagne? or perhaps a discourse about the brand essence of aston martin and bugatti? and if not naval history, what about art history? more seriously, would you be really there for the person when he needs you in return? that condition about being 'reachable' is interesting. why would you need an FB in an emergency? surely you have closer and more important friends, both male and female, to fall back upon. unless you're talking about an ATM-on-demand? i'm sorry, but it's just a little puzzling for me...

[tuxedosam]

maybe the idea of becoming bosom buddies through the context of being FBs is just a bit beyond me. of course i know FBs come in many varieties. already close friends that occasionally have sex without any overt romantic intent factored in. random ONS pick-ups that you keep in touch with and return to just for the physicality of the sex. and lotsa other flavors in between. my personal observations of other FB 'couples' is that the relationship tends to take on a more 'romantic', less 'no-strings-attached' angle once emotions and a sense of attachment are involved. not necessary a bad thing if both parties communicate transparently about it and can adjust accordingly. but that is often not the case. anyway, it sounds as if you're looking more for a sugar daddy who is 'committed' enough (relatively speaking) yet who can also tolerate a certain degree of latitude, leeway and open-endedness in the relationship...so maybe it'll just be different. i value friendship immensely. but an FB need not even strictly be a friend to begin with. so what's there to pick? hmph, i've only had limited 'first hand' personal experience so maybe i'm just 'inexperienced'. she was someone very special to me though. but someone whom i could only be a semi-FB/pseudo-BF to. and she was also my very best friend first and foremost. it was complicated...and very heartbreaking at the 'finish-line'. i wouldn't bore anyone with the details though. in the end, being soulmates just didn't make (enough of) a difference so... hey, what is there to begrudge? my point is just that it could be better to just compartmentalize things...mixing friendship with this FB business is just often too much of a hassle. too many lines to demarcate...too many complications and negative externalities...and too little payout... put it this way, if you're not thinking of a blowjob that might follow, you'll find the peaty, smoky intensity of the nicely aged single malt in your hand, and the charming interpersonal connection you make via an engaging conversation with a buddy, seriously a lot more enjoyable.

hey, sis TS, i understand your rationale and all about looking up contacts in SBF but maybe you ought to give AFF (adultfriendfinder) a shot as well, if what you said is sincere and honest, and if you haven't already done so. it's probably something more suited to your purposes. and go for the cheapest paid membership tier (silver) at the very least. not expensive at all and probably quite worth the outlay. also, i think you ought to consider mat sallehs as well. i am a so-called 'singaporean chinese man' but from what i know, especially based on the anecdotal accounts provided by my swinging and FB-loving SPG (i really dun wanna stereotype people like that but this is the only suitable shorthand i know to capture a certain concept, conceited prejudices included, my apologies anyway; i have nothing against gals who prefer white meat even if i find some of their thoughts on gender and ethnicity rather amusingly hypocritical and ironic...but do recall that they're a very diverse lot) friends and acquaintances, and factoring into consideration your unique set of prerequisites, you're probably better off looking at that end of the market. whether it's purchasing power or attitudes and outlooks, i think you'll probably find better matches there. it's a simple and straightforward issue of statistics and probability. of course if you have a racist or xenophobic thing against white folks, then i've got nothing to say either except that racism and nationalism suck. anyway, you sound articulate and capable enough. just get yourself a good education and work your way up the corporate ladder as well la. from what my CO tells me (though she's a lot more of a bag person), whether it's giuseppe zanotti, manolo blahnik or stuart weitzman one digs, you'll definitely appreciate each and every member of your shoe collection all the more when you're paying for them with cold, hard cash you deservingly earned on your won.

anyway, how do you really like your martinis? lychee martinis aren't that awful (depending on the bartender, i suppose, though most examples of bar help in singaporean are just pretty subpar), but still kinda new-fangled. i dig them, but sometimes, you just want a simple, no-nonsense, traditional martini too...mixed with premium gin, of course, and not, god forbid, vodka...a lil dry, with just that abbreviated allocation of vermouth for a smooth, slightly sweet finish. but to shake or to stir? hmph, despite what the world's most famous onscreen secret agent said (and it has to be pointed out that 007 had his made with vodka, remember?), the debate is far from finished (just like the ones about gin vs. vodka, or olive vs. twist). i'd just say that since it's hot on this island, using a shaker would probably give you a colder, more refreshing cocktail. but of course, at the end of the day, it's all just a mere matter of preference, right?

i do hope your preferences work out eventually.

i probably might love to apply but i guess you're outta my league anyway, heh.

please, dun nobody flame me or anyone else. even if we disagree, we agree to disagree... this might all just be wank-laden gobbledygook to you but at least it was all composed in good faith and honest fun. have a great day and cheers.

[FBInsp]

Wah bro tuxedosam, I guess ur essay writing in school must be A1...

[naturegreen]

Wa this is still going on and on for so long ar? Suggest can post in media corps la.......... invite guys who fit the below criteria(Close to perfect man) to take part in "Singapore 's very own bachelorette"! At least I think the selection will progress much faster.

There is no Qi, You Bi you Dua Niap Neh and Mian Lui. Or is TS trying to boost her own ego? -_-"

Can see many guys out there trying to impress her using all sorts of methods. Hahaha

Criteria
-Chinese male (Race Criteria)
-Above 1.7m (I love to wear heels and may end up taller.) (Height Criteria)
-Age 26 and above (Age Criteria)
-Average-looking and above (Facial Looks Criteria)
-Toned/Fit (Body Looks Criteria)
-Skilled lover (Performance Criteria)
-Gentlemanly/Caring (Personality Criteria)
-Will be there for me when I need him. (Not unreasonable-beck-and-call type but more of reachable-during-emergencies type.) (Availability Criteria)
-Will gladly buy me a pair of nice shoes every month. (If you feel I don't deserve it at any point in time, I will pay out of my own pocket.) (Financial Criteria)
-Must fulfill all above criteria.