|
Adult Discussions about SEX Misc chit chat about sex, whores, girls, love and lust. This section is a ZAP FREE zone. |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us...phy/index.html
(CNN) -- Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing -- a practice known as "upskirting" -- prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law. The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude. "A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is 'partially nude,' no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing," wrote Justice Margot Botsford of the state Supreme Judicial Court. CNN legal analyst Sunny Hostin said the law has not caught up to technology and called it an assault on a woman's right to privacy. "I think the courts got it wrong," Hostin said. "The spirit of the law makes it clear it is about the person's privacy." The ruling stems from the case against Michael Robertson, 32, who was arrested in 2010 and accused of using his cell phone to take pictures and record video up the skirts and dresses of women on the trolley, according to court documents. Two separate complaints were filed against Robertson with the transit police. Authorities then staged "a decoy operation" to catch Robertson, who was eventually arrested and charged with two counts of attempting to secretly photograph a person in a state of partial nudity. Police observed him point a cell phone video camera up the dress of a female officer, court documents state. Wednesday's ruling reversed a previous decision by a lower court, which had denied a motion by Robertson seeking the dismissal of the case, said a statement from the Suffolk County district attorney's office. "In sum, we interpret the phrase, 'a person who is ... partially nude' in the same way that the defendant does, namely, to mean a person who is partially clothed but who has one or more of the private parts of body exposed in plain view at the time that the putative defendant secretly photographs her," the high court ruled. The ruling that state law "does not apply to photographing (or videotaping or electronically surveilling) persons who are fully clothed and, in particular, does not reach the type of upskirting that the defendant is charged with attempting to accomplish on the MBTA." Prosecutors had argued that the current statute, which prohibits secretly photographing or videotaping a person who is "nude or partially nude," includes upskirting, according to documents. But Robertson's lawyers argued that the female passenger on the trolley was not "nude or partially nude" and was not in a place where she had a reasonable expectation of privacy, according to court documents. "Every person, male or female, has a right to privacy beneath his or her own clothing," Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel Conley said in a statement Wednesday. "If the statute as written doesn't protect that privacy, then I'm urging the Legislature to act rapidly and adjust it so it does." Robertson's lawyer, Michelle Menken, did not return a phone call seeking comment. Robertson faced misdemeanor charges punishable by up to two and half years in prison.
__________________
PM me for exchange pics / contacts OR Email me at [email protected] How I saw my mom had sex: https://sbf.rocks/showthread.php?t=49860 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
I say! Time to migrate to Massachusetts!!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
and a fucked up singpaorean guy like should cease to exist as to improve humanity genepool..
no wonder fucke up new generation singpaoran guys like you are the moles to humanity so fuck all new generation sngaporean guy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
In the glorious united states of america there are so many states with differing state laws for all of them.... Lets say tommorow florida legalises mass public sex so are u going to pull up stakes and make for florida?
Florida is on the eastern seaboard of the continental united states which makes it vunerable to hurricanes , military invasion and stinky cubans coming over with drugs..... Mr funkydude - i hear in some little town in iowa or idaho they have wild animal incest sessions so why not immigrate there?
__________________
Chameleonic online accent:Whatever I goddamn want to be. Great Red Dragon's Lair: http://www.sammyboyforum.com/showthread.php?t=389160 1st ever file GIVING/trading thread in sbf Proud owner of the largest publicly known Sharon Kho and Kelly Arrow Tan picture set |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
Yes, sound interesting.
__________________
Sharing is Better than Fighting Knowledge is a treasure but practice is the key to it ~ Thomas Fuller. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
I'll talk to you when you learn to spell. Till then, take a hike
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal
shut the fucked up, it seems like you need to take philosophical class in order to improve your morality as clearly you have fucked up shit
|
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
|
|