Romancing cat40 Thai WLs- Tactics and schemes.

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

The problem now isn't with me. The problem now is with you. You want me to admit to something which you think I did, you also must tell me, WHO I CON, HOW MUCH I CON, WHEN I CON.

Don't know what head or tail u making up.
U might as well say I con the govt's coffers, since you like to put words on me.

Anyway tonight I go hse43 and look for Rxxx and ask her the whole thing. Then I post the whole story lah, see whether what you say is the truth. U must be prepared huh, what she tell me about you and your tirak, I will have to say out to prove my innocence also.


SC

lol, SC... i didnt put words in your mouth. you put words in my mouth, then took words from my mouth to put them in your own. so dont come saying i malign or slander. i shared the joke with Jun, bcos i find it comical. you came forth to admit it and then ask for justifications. not enve interested to find out if its genuine or not. simply bcos, i dont do cheapshot in raking others backyard to smear their reputations.

please dont put on drama.. put a blood stained kinfe (that you cut yourself with) in my hand and claim i stab you. indeed, you really 自编自导自演. thanx for proving me right about you again.

WOW! going to the extent to pay nt to bonk but see RXXX to know my history, and coming here to post things..? what has that gotta do with proving your innocence? dont see the connection bro.. kindly please enlighten.

ps: my story is too damn long... i think you might wanna consider ON to get the whole thing right. perhaps you'd set record for coming up with the longest post ever written in sbf. and please post accurately or you'd end up being a story teller yourself, instead of a historian.


str1099

[swing123]

Originally Posted by DNAT

If you
- wear bikini/G-strings and dance on stage
- sit with female customers to earn drinks $
- kena raba by old tarts

Big Sexy, being your boyfren, SURE CAN TAHAN 1
(knnzz, I waited for this chance to blast you very long liao ... hiak 3)

shhhsssssshhhh...dun lah tell people i worked in that Boyz Club in Suriwongse....

[DNAT]

Originally Posted by swing123

shhhsssssshhhh...dun lah tell people i worked in that Boyz Club in Suriwongse....

what shift you working? I ask frens to go and support you lah - we throw S$50 note (currency note wraps pebble) at you .. hehe

[DNAT]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

please dont put on drama..... indeed, you really 自编自导自演. thanx for proving me right about you again.

str1099

Suteerak,
when I had kopi / chat with meatlover and swing123, they say you are not that jia lat .. hmmm ... actually in my heart I quite agree with them .

If I ask you, you now still want me to give face to free (which you had asked me to do so previously), after knowing
1. He wanted to borrow S$3k from JT. When i asked him about this, free claimed that
- JT supported his tirakship
- it was a mistake to ask
- "you never make a mistake meh? BULLSHIT!!!" (he asked me back)

2. I asked him why cannot postpone the visit meh?
- he said booked a car; rental already prepaid
- he said he 8 months never visit his tirak, he asked me back "you can tahan meh?"

3. When being asked why a samster's spouse passed him a Thai magazine and he cannot read, he said its different fonts.

STR1099, may I know your comments on the above ...

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by Adam's Family

hello, dont change topic leh. you said you heard the girl say SC con poeple's money, then is that it? since you like to TCSS and gossip (you said yourself one hor) I am sure you got ask her alot more things like how much SC con, in what currency, which girl etc etc... tell us lah, dont be so selfish or tell Jun only. This is what this forum is for right? Got good lobang must share. or shall we ask Jun|ch| what you told him. ask him to put out your pm to him?

AF, get the facts right. i heard and find it comical so i shared as a joke with Jun. i didnt put it in writing in public to defame pooooor SC of the acts- understanding too well that his paper face might be torn.

as mentioned by SC, his kakis also clueless about the tcss (between jun & i) going on. out of no where, no reason or rhyme, he pop up to acknowledge... and issue challenge for justifications. why plead guilty upfront and then request to be proven guilty? there's no communicsm here - guilty until proven innocent??? not so applicable in this region of the continent lah.

fact is, there was no accusation on my part. i didnt mention in public that SC took $ from WL(s), not until he openly claim he had done so. and as usual... the typical "where got? who say? how much? prove it" starts sprouting.

for one, i'm not in the least interested to know if its fact or fiction. end of the day, its only an online forum. he can jolly well be a player/ a tycoon/ a bummer/ a pimp/ a gigolo or whatever in reality. still boils down to 1 thing, if he cant even take such nonsense (which has been ongoing here for ages) in this web based community... he's gonna suffer big time in the real world.

sounds familiar? (similiar sentiments as to: if the tiraks cant handle the scrutiny here in the forum, they will have alot more problems in the real world)


str1099

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by DNAT

Suteerak,
when I had kopi / chat with meatlover and swing123, they say you are not that jia lat .. hmmm ... actually in my heart I quite agree with them .

If I ask you, you now still want me to give face to free (which you had asked me to do so previously), after knowing
1. He wanted to borrow S$3k from JT. When i asked him about this, free claimed that
- JT supported his tirakship
- it was a mistake to ask
- "you never make a mistake meh? BULLSHIT!!!" (he asked me back)

2. I asked him why cannot postpone the visit meh?
- he said booked a car; rental already prepaid
- he said he 8 months never visit his tirak, he asked me back "you can tahan meh?"

3. When being asked why a samster's spouse passed him a Thai magazine and he cannot read, he said its different fonts.

STR1099, may I know your comments on the above ...

uncle DNAT, since you put it across to me this gentlemanly fashion... then i also be gentleman with you.

1) i havent known bro free long enough to to be his character witness. his history, i hear bits n pieces here there everywhere (sometimes from the horse's mouth as well), so its unfair for me to say if his truly trustworthy or not. all i can say is, i've seen people stuggling all their lives at the lowest low, i've seen some fallen from grace... all that aside, its important that they pick themselves up and move on. 人往高处爬，水往低处流

2) the deposit and all i cant agree... it seems to me a case of miscalculations. if i was in that situation, i'd prefer to have itinerary and finances worked out, with ample reserves in case murphy's law smiles at me.

3) i think that still quite alright lah. different font or typeface... perhaps sometimes abit harder to recognise. but to be fair, my pasathai mai gaeng... so i also cant comment on this.

as square as it gets... MHO.

[free]

Originally Posted by DNAT

Suteerak,
when I had kopi / chat with meatlover and swing123, they say you are not that jia lat .. hmmm ... actually in my heart I quite agree with them .

If I ask you, you now still want me to give face to free (which you had asked me to do so previously), after knowing

DNAT, please open yr eyes and read properly. So far u only read portions of what u want. What I am unhappy about is the way you structure your post - to give false impressions and add your own twist to my story by putting things in different chronological order and also to link different things together when they are totally not related. It indicates that behind many of your posts, are absolutely ill-intentions.

1. He wanted to borrow S$3k from JT. When i asked him about this, free claimed that
- JT supported his tirakship
- it was a mistake to ask
- "you never make a mistake meh? BULLSHIT!!!" (he asked me back)

Let me ask u- I explained the above scenario, I admitted I made a mistake to ask JT in a moment of panic (as I was due to leave in a few days), and I also said I EARNED new monies for my planned spending on that trip by getting new projects and I DID NOT borrow at all. And even if JT is willing, I will still not borrow cos I have enough for the planned trip. Yet u totally ignore that and went on and went to link unrelated things together? By linking an attempt to borrow money for a PAST trip with a FUTURE trip, what is yuour intention? And FACT is I did not borrow from JT and I did not bug him for it. It is obvious what u were trying to do - make me look bad cos u cannot catch me any other way!

2. I asked him why cannot postpone the visit meh?
- he said booked a car; rental already prepaid
- he said he 8 months never visit his tirak, he asked me back "you can tahan meh?"

I answered I had paid up to 40% of the cost of that trip (8 months ago) and they are not refundable, hence I did not want waste all those money. Did u accept that explanation? No, u simply ignored it and proceed on to twist more stories. And what the hell has that trip got to do with a future trip that has yet to happen? Don't u think that I would make sure I have enough cash ON HAND this time? Why should I postpone it further if I dun need to? So that u can be shiok? What has it got to do with you anyway? If I chose not to cheong in this 8 months that I dun get to see my tirak, why are u uncomfortable? Cos u secretly wished u had it in you to control your urge? If not, why else are u not happy that u must make an issue out of it?

I obliged your friend when he met me and ask me to lighten up. But did u do the same? All this while I only respond when u attack me. Ppl can see what u are doing - just busy kaypoing into others affairs cos u think u know everything?

3. When being asked why a samster's spouse passed him a Thai magazine and he cannot read, he said its different fonts.

This is a fact and I showed Ryan Lim myself. Only then did he realised that he had misunderstood and said he will explain to you since he was the one who told you the wrong story in the first place. Only after I showed him how different thai fonts can look so different (and it is reasonable for a non-thai not to be familiar with the less common fonts, while the thais grew up with all sorts of fonts.) I posted them here before and u are either blind thoroughly or selectively and filtered them out?Any reasonable person who has some brains would have accepted that, but NO, not DNAT. Just so that u can see it again here it is. If u still refuse to see how different they are, then it is obvious you are out to make trouble. The 1st 2 fonts are common and the rest are not.


If like that, u still cannot see what I am saying and totally ignored every single one of my explanations, what does it mean? It can only mean u are out to make trouble. Why don;t u go and ask Mr Ryan Lim since he was the one who told u wrongly in first place, cos he dun know thai writing has different fonts until I showed him a few weeks later?

So Mr Nice Guy, Ryan, what u told me u will do, I am still waiting.....for now, I give u benefit of doubt as u said you had something personal to attend to,

[free]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

2) the deposit and all i cant agree... it seems to me a case of miscalculations. if i was in that situation, i'd prefer to have itinerary and finances worked out, with ample reserves in case murphy's law smiles at me..

All I can say is that was the first time I made that mistake.... to assume that the customer will pr prompt to pay up cos he had always been prompt. And as long as I dun repeat it again, ,my conscience is clear. It only goes to show how some people will find ways and means to pick on someone, cos he has a different mindset from him.... why maybe he even thinks he owns this forum ? So all views must be in line with his?

[Bangkok Master]

Originally Posted by free

Only after I showed him how different thai fonts can look so different (and it is reasonable for a non-thai not to be familiar with the less common fonts, while the thais grew up with all sorts of fonts.) I posted them here before and u are either blind thoroughly or selectively and filtered them out?Any reasonable person who has some brains would have accepted that, but NO, not DNAT. Just so that u can see it again here it is. If u still refuse to see how different they are, then it is obvious you are out to make trouble. The 1st 2 fonts are common and the rest are not.

Frankly speaking, nobody in the forum will laugh at you if you cannot read due to the differences of fonts.......... But if you want to advertise to teach thai language then there's a problem. No doubt you are good in self teaching but teaching someone else is a different issue. Morever how are you going to jusitfy to the ppl paying for your services, if let's say they want to translate a sentence which is a different font? Don't tell me that you're gonna give the same answer that you posted.

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by Bangkok Master

Frankly speaking, nobody in the forum will laugh at you if you cannot read due to the differences of fonts.......... But if you want to advertise to teach thai language then there's a problem. No doubt you are good in self teaching but teaching someone else is a different issue. Morever how are you going to jusitfy to the ppl paying for your services, if let's say they want to translate a sentence which is a different font? Don't tell me that you're gonna give the same answer that you posted.

I be very frank.

I learned from Kampong Glam CC which I had a local teacher. A singaporean, not a thai. After 3 lessons I left the class and switched to Telelingua
And I had another teacher in Telelingua whereby I had a native teacher. A Khon Thai.

So I can only say that no matter what, the Khon thais from young already breathe, eat and drink thai, they already learn thai language same as what we learn our mother tongue and english from young in singapore.

If anyone wants to learn how to read and write, learn from a native. If anyone wants to learn how to say simple sentences, you can simply learn from those who can speak thai. Depends on what are your standard that you want to learn to.

But if you want to have a good foundation and learn good thai, I can only say go Telelingua, (a school that the Thai embassy approves). Because the teachers and course there are approved by the Thai embassy.Many pte schools teach a variety of languages but doesn't mean that they have good instructors

SC

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by Adam's Family

str1099, you damn funny leh.
how long do you know SC? have you even met him? what have people said about SC and what? who do you hear about SC from?

You cant be free's character witness, but you can be SC's character witness? And do such a good job at analysing his character by just hearing something from the WL??

You think it's not fair for you to say is free is trustworthy, but...
You think it's fair to say SC is a con man when you only heard a rumor or gossip?

Please dont give us all the bullshit about SC saying he himself admmited to the act etc....

and also please tell us what you heard that is so funny. share it with us please, why only share it with Jun? you think only Jun have a sense of humour and we dont? unless you have cooked up that story yourself and think it's funny

are you going to share the stories with us? yes or no. simple. dont bring us on the merry go around again.

AF, you never fail to tickle me with your postings. as i said, i hear about SC, to think that it came from the WLs' mouths, i can only gather that he's probably quite detastable, even to the WLs when in fact, most walk-in are like ATM to them. nevertheless, giving SC the benefit of doubt, i had a good laugh about it with Jun.

last but not least, do you even know what is a character witness? just to give you a better idea. all the rebuting/rebuking from you fellas, only serves as supporters. but if you come forward to testify and say SC is a righteous person, a man of integrity to his principles, and prove otherwise of the so-called 'rumours'...then that makes you his character witness.

which is why i say i dont qualify to be bro free's character witness. AF, time for you to buck up before attempting to make of fool of yourself in other's defense.

str1099

[suteerak1099]

Originally Posted by free

All I can say is that was the first time I made that mistake.... to assume that the customer will pr prompt to pay up cos he had always been prompt. And as long as I dun repeat it again, ,my conscience is clear. It only goes to show how some people will find ways and means to pick on someone, cos he has a different mindset from him.... why maybe he even thinks he owns this forum ? So all views must be in line with his?

bro free, dont get me wrong... in my opinion its a case of miscalculation on your part. every1 makes mistakes, who doesnt? some divine being perhaps. as long as you repent, so long as you adopt a positive attitute in making ammendments to remedy the situation... then its safe to say that all's well.

about others picking on the fallen... as you said, no different from a pack of hyenas waiting to feast on a weakened soul on the prairie. some just enjoy dropping pebbles and stones on the fallen, when it could have been a swift and clean death.

at the end of the day, its what goes on in your real life that really matters. this virtual world and 'reel' life is just an avenue for some to put others down, in doing so, nothing but just a frail attempt to inflate their deflated/deflating egoes.

take heart bro.. take heart.

str1099

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by suteerak1099

AF, you never fail to tickle me with your postings. as i said, i hear about SC, to think that it came from the WLs' mouths, i can only gather that he's probably quite detastable, even to the WLs when in fact, most walk-in are like ATM to them. nevertheless, giving SC the benefit of doubt, i had a good laugh about it with Jun.

but if you come forward to testify and say SC is a righteous person, a man of integrity to his principles, and prove otherwise of the so-called 'rumours'...then that makes you his character witness.


str1099

wah, more and more clues coming out from Suteerak1099 on whether what he say is correct.

So finally admit you are talking about me. I thought initially you deny?

No need to give me benefit of doubt.
I can only tell you to go thailand and check on your tirak first. That is your utmost priority.

As for my case, don't mind can share your laughter with the rest of the samsters by washing my dirty linen here as said by you. Even I had no objections, what is stopping you?

hahaha
SC

[reuters]

Originally Posted by siamcutey

No need to give me benefit of doubt.
I can only tell you to go thailand and check on your tirak first. That is your utmost priority.
SC

I thought he ask junlchl to check for him already

[siamcutey]

Originally Posted by reuters

I thought he ask junlchl to check for him already

Ask who to check also no use. Ownself use your eyes to see is more believing. Other people see liao, tell you, u believe meh?

SC