Am i a low income worker? - Page 12

BMW69 · #**166** 02-05-2015, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoJoe313

Are you ok bro?! What happened? Why are you in hospital?!

Haha dengue. Maybe my bloody neighbours didn't spray as regularly as they should. So I have needles poked everywhere on my arm, IV drip and blood transfusion as required. I am slowly getting better though. Thanks for your concern.

sammyboyfor · #**167** 02-05-2015, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BMW69

Can you please ban him? He's spamming these videos everywhere and they have nothing to do with anything sexual. I always thought the no spamming rule was quite clear cut.

This section if of anything under the sun. It does not have to be sexual.

However, embedding them slows down the whole page and the thread cannot load properly.

BMW69 · #**168** 02-05-2015, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuasimi

Any bad points about PAP is considered Spam. That is PAP IBs for you. Bad points about Opposition is considered Holy Gospel. You from Media?

Excuse me, in how many threads did you post the exact same messages, videos and articles? How is that not considered spam? Anyway, TS has already said that you're not welcome in his thread. Just stay in your own thread and kpkb to whoever visits it.

MoJoe313 · #**169** 02-05-2015, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BMW69

True, but I feel that the current CPF formulae and the rules that are currently put in place is fair. What happens if someone is allowed to withdraw 100% of his CPF funds and loses it in the stock market? Who is he going to cry mother cry father to? I'm very glad that Singapore is not a welfare state and I certainly hope that it stays that way.

Personally, I like the CPF. I too hope the withdrawal rules stay. The argument I cannot agree with is if it is invested together with other govt assets, shouldn't the whole basket collect the same 5%?

kuasimi · #**170** 02-05-2015, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

This section if of anything under the sun. It does not have to be sexual.

However, embedding them slows down the whole page and the thread cannot load properly.

I agree I am operating within the controls. But technical issues is not within my control. I only contribute.

BMW69 · #**171** 02-05-2015, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoJoe313

Personally, I like the CPF. I too hope the withdrawal rules stay. The argument I cannot agree with is if it is invested together with other govt assets, shouldn't the whole basket collect the same 5%?

I can't comment on this because I have not done my due diligence in this matter. It is admittedly not a matter that I have yet to be very concerned about.

MoJoe313 · #**172** 02-05-2015, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BMW69

Haha dengue. Maybe my bloody neighbours didn't spray as regularly as they should. So I have needles poked everywhere on my arm, IV drip and blood transfusion as required. I am slowly getting better though. Thanks for your concern.

Take care bro.

I want you in a full healthy state...... to argue passionately

leakypipes · #**173** 02-05-2015, 03:52 PM

can we just ignore kuasimi? make it like he doesn't exist? i mean, he thinks he is smarter than all of us, and if you even dare to suggest otherwise, you must be PAP IB.

This is the first, and last time, I am going to even say anything about kuasimi.

anyway -to the TS, I wanna say, bro, you could be low or middle income. But more importantly is you spend within your means, and look for ways to cross to next level. it is not impossible in singapore. actually it is not impossible anywhere in the world. But from my limited experience (i am only in mid thirties and have only lived for more than 1 month in 4 cities outside of singapore), there are far less hoops to jump through in Singapore in order to cross to next level.

BMW69 · #**174** 02-05-2015, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoJoe313

Take care bro.

I want you in a full healthy state...... to argue passionately

Don't worry, even though my body is not well, my mind and fingers are still very active. I hope you found the Census results helpful in helping you to see the light

JohnHor9Gan99 · #**175** 02-05-2015, 03:53 PM

Ministers also can say they are low income workers. As long as you are greedy, there are no limit

kuasimi · #**176** 02-05-2015, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wittyman

agree, seems the new one disconnected from the ground ...

PAP Old Guards no scholars but still do better job than New PAP scholars. Scholars not equal to Good Government.

sammyboyfor · #**177** 02-05-2015, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuasimi

I agree I am operating within the controls. But technical issues is not within my control. I only contribute.

It has nothing to do with technical issues. Embedding videos is neither necessary nor desirable.

You can simply post a link to the videos concerned so those who are interested can view them on youtube.

You also don't have to post the same videos and messages over and over again in different threads. I have deleted them.

The threads here are for you to state YOUR views not copy and paste from other sources.

BMW69 · #**178** 02-05-2015, 04:03 PM

Fun facts, since I'm so bored.

The PAP old guards consisted of people such as:
1. Lee Kuan Yew (LSE and then Cambridge)
2. S. Rajaratnam (King's College)
3. Toh Chin Chye (UOL)
4. Goh Keng Swee (LSE)

I'm so glad that they were not scholar material otherwise they would do as bad as the current crop of scholars. Of course, LKY didn't get a scholarship to study in UK. He went there with whatever money his parents no longer had. How peculiar.

kuasimi · #**179** 02-05-2015, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

It has nothing to do with technical issues. Embedding videos is neither necessary nor desirable.

You can simply post a link to the videos concerned so those who are interested can view them on youtube.

You also don't have to post the same videos and messages over and over again in different threads. I have deleted them.

The threads here are for you to state YOUR views not copy and paste from other sources.

I only posted the youtube links. But you deleted even those with pictures only. Silencing people is what Singaporeans dont need.

kuasimi · #**180** 02-05-2015, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BMW69

Fun facts, since I'm so bored.

The PAP old guards consisted of people such as:
1. Lee Kuan Yew (LSE and then Cambridge)
2. S. Rajaratnam (King's College)
3. Toh Chin Chye (UOL)
4. Goh Keng Swee (LSE)

I'm so glad that they were not scholar material otherwise they would do as bad as the current crop of scholars. Of course, LKY didn't get a scholarship to study in UK. He went there with whatever money his parents no longer had. How peculiar.

These people were not scholars as of the likes of New PAP. These PAP Old Guards leaders became leaders under tougher conditions than the New PAP.

Competition breeds quality. Sadly, New PAP erected so many barriers of entry into Singapore politics that Alternatives became almost impossible.